Progressing and Finishing the Website

Throughout the continual development of our website, we repeatedly cross referenced and compared our designs with that of similar acts associated with the Indie Rock genre. Conclusively, we can see that the main artists to have an influence on our own website are George Ezra, Alt-J and the Arctic Monkeys - as we blended their graphic design and layout styles with our own new inginuitive ideas. Making the website was a collaborative process for me and Rachel, with her doing the bulk of the digital creation, but with us both making creative decisions together at each stage. After research into similar products, myself and Rachel decided that our website would contain 6 key pages. These were;

. Home - The direction base of the website that allows the user to navigate between pages.

. Contact - This would effectively allow the user to become a member of the website which would entitle them to news letters and promotional information via email. It also allows them to submit fan mail.

. About - This offers a brief biography of the band that can also be found in the Digipak.

. Gallery - This displays the latest photos taken of the band at either fan events, live performances or on music video shoots.

. Merchandise - This is the official shopping page for the band and allows fans to purchase official merchandise.

. Live - This discloses information of the band's upcoming live performances and whether tickets are still available.

These sub categories would effectively help an audience member navigate themselves around the key information of the site. After already completing a bulk of the website, we decided to add in a slightly uncommon design feature that created a supplementary page to these 6. Despite it not being an entirely common convention, we both liked the idea of 'Enter Site' page that lets the audience know exactly where they are. Another artist who has employed a similar page to this in the real world is George Ezra with his website similarly displaying a bold font and a large, natural picture of the artist. Ours simply includes a 'recent' shot of the band in 'action' which of course was taken on our shoot day and then this is paired with our signature band font. This is then sidelined by two options which were to either enter the site or watch the new video. This acts as immediate promotion for views in the video which is important, while also supplying an interesting design element. This allowed us to also work around another problem we encountered earlier. We didn't feel comfortable embedding a frame containing our new video on any of the pages as we felt it looked sub standard and messy, and detracted from the refined and minimalist style we had been working towards. 

In regard to the homage, we used the website of British Indie Rock band Alt-J as a significant reference point, as we were fans of their look.

Both of these home pages have a distinct aura of simplicity. We have adopted a minimalist and abstract brush stroke across the centre which harbours the band name and the name of the latest album. As you can see we continued the London tube element and did so throughout the whole website as we felt this was hugely important. Websites of real life bands will often adapt and evolve based on the style of their most recent output. The homepage also has a reference to social networking, which is a mainstay of the marketing of any artist in the music industry today. Furthermore, the subheadings alter to the colour of the tube line that lies beneath them when hovering the curser over it. This is a pleasing design element. The important details about the homepage is where we reference our own iconography with the logo, font and London tube theme. This hammers home the bands image and makes it coherent with the rest of the pages. The rest of the website features original content devised by Rachel, with my help. This is apart from the 'Live' page, where the tour information was taken from George Ezra's website as we felt this would be more realistic and accurate than us making up our own. 

This is the way the rest of our website is looking currently and can be viewed vie this internet link http://rachelharrison5.wix.com/website;

All of these pages are interactive on an internet platform, despite working much more effectively on Apple software on account of this being the interface in which it was designed. More importantly, they are entirely coherent with one another and look as though they belong to the same website which. I believe the website looks largely believable as a professional product and suits the band and the rest of their output. Unlike our other two products, both myself and Rachel will be keen to revisit the website with fresh eyes upon our return from the winter break, to try to spot any minor details that need to be rectified before completely declaring it complete. However, I am comfortable in the knowledge that we have effectively finished what appears to be an innovative and visually interesting website and therefore all three of our promotional products related to this band. 

Merchandise

Before completing the website, both myself and Rachel decided that we wanted to include a merchandise page on our website. We confirmed through our research that the most common item available on sites of a similar genre was a t-shirt. Rachel used the following website to create the personalised t-shirts; 

http://www.vistaprint.co.uk/gallery/IHQCAAABAAAAAAA=/signaturesoft-men%E2%80%99s-t-shirts.aspx?xnav=MensTshirts_TsrButton

Our hand-drawn logo is individual to our band so we decided to make this the mainstay of our t-shirt design, coupled with the very simplistic 'tee's' which are very in-trend at the moment with the type of demographic we are aiming for with our band. 

We eventually narrowed these down to three key designs;

As was said, these are all very basic designs but that was an intentional choice. The branding is nevertheless strong and this is what is in fashion currently. They were then all published on the 'Merchandise' sector of our website as unisex t-shirts selling for £15 pounds each.

I then came up with the idea of Elephant Castle also distributing vinyl records as merchandise. The recent influx of vinyl sales in the music industry is something I am well aware of, as I documented it in one of my summer research blog tasks where I interviewed a local record shop owner. Furthermore, similar indie rock bands to ours such as Arctic Monkeys and The XX do a similar thing to reinforce their image, or simply out of admiration for the more traditional format. We selected what we might imagine to be the bands three biggest hits and then created vinyl records for them which we displayed on the same page, selling for £2.50 each. This would give the fans a physical object relating to the band which they can own and cherish. In many ways it is an extension of the Digipak and allows then to legitimise their support for the band in another way.

Finished Digipak

After adjustments based on various bits of feedback, we finally reached the completion of our Digipak - with four panels and spine. The creation of this product has been a real gradual process that has stretched over a large portion of time. There was a small list of final alterations that had to be made before we could deem it complete.

The final adjustments made to the product since the last draft were;

Front Panel 
- We made the logo black instead of white. We did this on the biography page and found that it made it much more visible and didn't look out of place also.

Biography Panel
- The logo is also black on this panel, creating continuity throughout the Digipak.
- When displaying this page to peers we noticed there were a few grammatical errors that we rectified in the text. We also altered the wording slightly to make it flow better.

CD Panel
- For display reasons, we inserted a CD holder template to show where the CD would actually slot in. This would make the design clearer during the manufacturing of the product. It would not actually exist in the final print.

Back Panel
- The only changes necessary on the back were related to spelling.

Finally we layed out the panels in a formation that would suitable for them to be sent off to print, judged by where they would have to fold in relation to one another. Overall, we are really pleased with the design and completion of our Digipak. I believe it is entirely believable as a professional product and captures the mood, genre and tone of the band superbly.

Digipack Spine and Layout

Before completing the Digipak there were a few final decisions that had to be made regarding the spine and layout. The way in which the CD is stored within the Digipak is a creative and personal preference. After reviwing various Digipaks that we had at our disposal we chose the more classic plastic casing option, as we felt it suited the style of the Digipak more.

The next step in completing the finishing touches of the Digipak was to decide and design the spine of the album. This is a practical requirement as it binds the album together. We created a space large enough for the spine and then considered what needed to be written. It needs to disclose the key information of the album and is reasonably important as it is the only section that is seen when the album is on a shelf. Much like with the layout, we looked at other real-life Digipaks before making a decision. We designed the spine with contuniuity and in the same colour as the rest of the Digipak. We then continued the use of our bold font utilising the two key colours of black and white, and coupled this with our band logo. These details brought our Digipak product to near completion.

Finished Music Video

Edit: 5

As the editing process continued, I could feel I was getting closer to finishing the product. After an encouraging response from our focus group I knew that it was largely completed, but certain things needed to be refined and sharpened. The section in most demand was undoubtedly the beginning with the white background. Despite showing all the key factors in chronological order, it was slow and didn't flow well. It was hugely important that this section works well as it is the opening of the video, so therefore has to engage the audience and encourage them to continue watching. In order to do this we wanted the instruments to be brought on in the video sooner. However, this was extremely difficult to coordinate as the entrance of the instruments where strictly cued and therefore could only come on at a certain point during the song. If I brought this forward in the song, then the audience would be able to see that the singer is heavily out of sync. However, I felt this change was important so I attempted to work around it. Logistically I would be able to use footage of all of the instruments, as long as I did not cut to a wide shot during the process as this would display the lead singer. This meant I had to take considerable time in shifting the footage and avoiding wide shots, and replacing them with mid shots and close ups that in some cases weren't even in the rough cut. This reinforces the importance of storing all rush footage within the software. Once I had established through the editing that all the instruments had been brought on, I was then able to return to the wide shots. This was a lengthy process and a tricky edit but I felt it was worth the time as it gives the opening section considerably more pace and makes it more watchable. During this process, I also decided to remove the shots of the lyric cards and the cigarette being brought on. I simply felt that these shots didn't work thematically and in conjunction with the rest of the video, especially considering that it is clear to see that it is not a real cigarette. Part of this overhaul was dictated by my decision to look at the video intently and decide whether every shot was completely relevant and was cut to for a reason. This helped me decipher what content was working. Aside from this, all I then had to do to this section was create the split screen effect we had planned and finally color correct the section so that the whites from the two different cameras we filmed on matched up. This final change made a huge difference to the effect of the video, making it look more refined and professional.

After this I then refined the recording studio cutaway by adding a different shot of Ben drumming. It is important to use as many different shots as possible over the course of the video to offer versatility. After this I moved onto to the final episode of the video in the black studio, which I re-cut slightly as there was one moment that included too many consecutive shots of Calum, the lead singer. Despite being the clear focal point of the group, it is important to break up the video with band footage. Finally, I reviewed the entire video with the intention of making the cuts more on the beat of the music, apart from shots that are purposely off-beat. To the untrained eye this would make little difference, but it heavily improves the natural and seamless look of the edit. 

Furthermore, I purposely left in some diegetic sound at then end of the video once the actual track has finished. This is fairly common in music videos, as you can see in this video by the same artist that we are using - George Ezra. This video is littered diegetic sound that makes it more memorable and quirky. I left in the sound clip recorded on the day of the stylist spraying hairspray into the lead singers hair. I chose not to make this too loud as I personally feel it can become overpowering and therefore detract from the song, like in the 'Blame it On Me' video. One can also faintly hear a member of the crew complementing the take, before the drummer then releases his foot from the symbol pedal producing a sound, at which point the image cuts out. Having this moment of relative silence where we see the band after shooting a take reinforces our message - that this is a repeated and manufactured process.

Once completing these tasks, I felt confident that I had produced a finished product. Based on my immediate response, I am very happy with the video as I feel it effectively communicates our intentions and themes. I am proud that myself and Rachel have managed to produce a video of this quality and feel that even in the last week since our rough cut, the video has developed overwhelmingly to what we have now.

Rough Cut

 Finished Video

Correcting the Digipak

After receiving critique from the focus group, myself and Rachel decided to rectify the problems that were raised during the meeting. The group made useful comments that could easily refine our product. Below are some annotated images detailing the adjustments we have made.

The back cover of the Digipak is what needed most work of all of them. As raised in the focus group, the back of the head was in fact on the wrong side of the panel and therefore did not correspond with the front. To rectify this we simply flipped the entire image horizontally in Photoshop. However, this consequently also flipped the text meaning we had to re-write the song titles. We also added some copyright information and a barcode, two features that make the cover look considerably more legitimate and true to real life.

The inner panel that holds the CD has changed the noticeably as we have reconfigured the width and layering of the lines to make it resemble the tube logo more effectively and therefore be more recognisable.

The main edit to this section was the boldness of the text which needed increasing to make it more eligible. We chose doing this over changing the font to black as we thought that it would then lack continuity with the front cover. I also came up with the idea of adding the band logo to the biography as a nice stylistic feature. 

Focus Group

Today was the day of the pre-arranged focus group, where we could gain some feedback from a key demographic of late teenagers that we could carry on into our continual development. We showed them the three key products (as shown in previous blog post) and questioned them on their opinions on each and then finally the products as a collection, based on their stylistic continuity. We recorded the entire session so that we could document it, allowing me to summarise the key points in three separate sections. There are obvious paused points in this clip where the group have been offered time to review the products individually. We deliberately showed the group the Digipak and website first, as the video itself is normally the biggest indicator of the genre of an act and we wanted to determine whether the group could guess this without it.

DIGIPAK 

- All the people in the focus group raised their hand when questioned whether they liked the London Underground tube theme. They felt it was strong, visually identifiable and worked well with the Digipak, especially in the way the songs have been listed on the back cover.

- Someone mentioned that the biography was quite difficult to read due to the font used being quite faint in terms of its density. She suggested that this could be altered to make it more legible. 

- When questioned on the genre of the band based on what they could see from the Digipak, someone mentioned that they thought it was quite 'poppy'. However, this individual was immediately met  with disagreement with others strongly believing that it was closer to a rock band with a few mentioning the terms 'indie' and 'alternative' - just as we had hoped. 

- I then asked them if it was clear what we had done with the faces on the Digipak. Many people responded by saying it was obvious that we had amalgamated the faces of what they presumed to be a band. However, one person suggested that that back cover should be flipped so that the heads were in the same place on either side of the Digipak. This was of course what we had intended but only realised that this wouldn't work when sticking them together. This is something we will have to alter before properly sending them to print. However, it is not a crucial problem. 

- In conclusion, I asked them whether they liked it in general and this was met positively with lots of them thinking it was unique, different and interesting. As means of improvement one person mentioned he found the grey slightly boring so this is something we may consider. 

WEBSITE

- We started by explaining the difficulties we had preparing the website and how it was the least developed of the products.

- One person described how it made them think of India due to the elephant being a key visual image on the homepage.

- One person described how they thought it was very alternative. She said that we are not going down a mainstream route and therefore it is memorable. 

- The group once again reinforced how they liked the London Underground them. 

- An individual mentioned how they would expect to see a picture of the band performing on the homepage. 

VIDEO

- We outlined to the group that this is our first cut of the video and we were open to ideas about altering it. We were slightly pressed for time so this period of questioning wasn't as lengthly as I might of liked.

- When asked what they thought the video was about, one person immediately responded "The band". This may seem a fairly one dimensional response but is fairly accurate as the video does focus in on the band and their journey in the modern industry. 

- A few mentioned how it was clear that they were all really good friends and it was nice to be able to see their personalities, most notably in the recording studio section.

- Someone proclaimed that they liked the way the video "builded" throughout. She said that normally you don't see this in music videos. 

- One girl mentioned that she felt the last set up was like the 'final product', after seeing this gradual progression and getting know the band.

- I questioned what they felt about the 'mood' of the band. They all understood that the band were uncomfortable in the process of making the music video. It appeared this tone was clear as one person described "they loved music but not necessarily making a music video".

- One person criticised by saying that they couldn't see the London underground theme played out through the video as you might hope. However, he said the video wasn't too far detached from the other products. 

- However, another individual claimed the video made it clear that they were a "English" band and that they are "alternative", and this was reinforced by the name. 

Upon reflection, I am pleased with the way the focus group session went. We received some useful feedback on each of the products. People liked the Digipak, concluding that the visual theme was strong and iconic. This alone went some way in communicating the genre of the band effectively. The focus group could clearly identify that the website wasn't complete and needed work, so I feel they therefore withheld critique which they may have otherwise put forward. Despite responding positively to some of its features, one person interestingly suggested that they would expect to see images of the band. We had planned a 'Media' page which would without doubt include lots of pictures of the band, but this was in the previous draft of the website. Contrary to the individuals belief, our research shows that home pages for bands of similar genre (The Kooks, Alt-J) are normally dedicated soul to graphic design as opposed to pictures of the band. This is something we may trial further before making a final decision. In terms of the video, the response was largely very positive with the majority of people understanding it thematically and having little criticism. Some mention that they couldn't identify a continuation of the London Underground theme within the video which is a fair point. This is not something we can alter as the shoot date has passed. However realistically, this is a single music video for one of the songs from an entire album. This means it is unlikely that the bands management would style a whole website and Digipak solely around one video. The music videos that accompany that album are the products that are most likely to show versatility in the real world. In conclusion, I am glad we had this opportunity. It is quite easy when creating things that you are constantly working on to become immune to their effect. This group gave us 'fresh eyes' and the opportunity to use new opinions to go forward. 

Edit: 4 / Development & Preparation for Focus Group

With our focus group date approaching, myself and Rachel decided that we would speed up the process of product development by splitting up the work. Up until now, we had done everything together. This has worked thus far but now there was slightly more pressure to produce. We decided that I would take soul responsibility for the continual editing of the video, whereas Rachel would control the progress of the Digipak and website. We would both continue to have input in this development and would refer any changes we have made to the other group member.  

In terms of the editing, I continued to cut the video - now picking pace after becoming more aquatinted with the footage and software. I decided I would cut the video on three separate timelines, decided by the three different obvious sections of our video. This made the process more structural and organised, like 'building blocks'. My aim was to complete a rough cut of the video before the focus group. The hardest of these sections to finish was the infinity background section. This was due to the array of continuity complications that this brought with it. Furthermore, the editing took a greater chunk of the video than we expected meaning we had to make the decision to cut some elements we had filmed, such as the green screen. This meant that we could still cut to the recording studio footage at the same point in the song, which I thought was more important for the concept of the video. However, once completing this I was then able to proceed with the other two sections that were considerably easier to cut together due to them being largely basic performance footage. With our recording studio cutaway, I had to search through lots of footage to find the most natural moments of the band to show their personality. I was really happy with this section as I felt it created some nice contrast with the other two, more much more produced setups for the video. Finally, I arrived at the black studio setup which allowed me to edit in a more expressive way due to the free flowing, tracking shots. This gives the video visual zest and allows it to stray away from the very 'flat on' style featured at the beginning. Without doubt, certain things about the video still need to be altered. The white balance for some of the shots still needs to be colour corrected. This is once of the last things I will do in the editing process. The white studio section of the video still needs to be sharpened meaning we may have to add some other footage or simply switch things around slightly. Furthermore, we were unable to get round to inputing the 'split screen' effect with the band members head and shoulder shots, as we had storyboarded just before the recording studio cutaway. This is perfectly achievable, and is something we can do at a later date. This is responsible for the held shots of both Joe and Ben in the rough cut. Otherwise, I am happy with what I have been able to achieve in a relatively short space of time.

After reaching a decent stage as a pair, Rachel continued to make developments with the Digipak on her own. The designs for these panels have been set for a while, so after our photographic work had been completed to a good standard, Rachel just had to add the graphic design elements. She first added the London tube theme, using sporadic colourful tube lines that she created herself. These were careful interwoven around the images before adding the text, in a bold and simplistic font. We decided we would keep the grey from the original images as we liked the industrial look and felt it contrasted nicely with the more vibrant colours of the tube lines.

FRONT COVER

 BACK COVER

 INNER PANEL

 INNER PANEL

After finishing a rough draft of the Digipak that we were very happy with, we decided we would print  this off in the correct sizing before then clueing and and sticking the panels together. This is not of the same quality as the final version will be, yet nevertheless it is in a physical format and gives the focus group the oportunity the hold it and view it in its desired form. 

Furthermore, Rachel made key changes to the website also. Although we really liked the design that we had previously with the oil painting acting as a backdrop, it lacked continuity with the Digipak and they looked as though they represented two separate acts. Due to this, we made the decision to re-format the website and continue the Underground them on the web. Due to this change, Rachel wasn't able to complete as much of the website as she had done previously meaning we could only prepare a homepage, and one that still needs considerable work. However, we had a clear intention with this meaning the focus group will be able to see what direction we are going in with the website. 

As you can see, we now have three well prepared and interesting products which we can display to our focus group tomorrow and gain some useful feedback.

Re-Designing the Logo

Both myself and Rachel liked the logo we had found on the internet - to be symbolic of the bands name as act as their key piece of iconography. However, we wanted to adapt this logo and make it our own in some way. We also felt that it was slightly too messy and wanted to condense it down into something more minimalistic. 

Rachel decided she would draw the image onto a plain piece of paper using a much more basic design with less tonal lines. This made the image look more abstract and almost cartoon like, as opposed to the more textually real original. 

She then scanned the image and uploaded it into photoshop. Rachel adjusted the contrast and a few other features to make it more bold. She used the eraser tool to get rid of certain marks caused by the scanner. Following on from this, she used the 'Background Eraser' tool to delete the background enabling us to remove the white background and then place it on the website without a boarder. After doing this, we are now able to use this logo in whichever way we wish and use it to show continuity with our following two products. 

What is a focus group?

A 'focus group' is a well established method within the business world of gaining information about a product. The aim is to display products in a way that does not direct an audience in order to gain as much impartial feedback as possible. This information can then be used to build and improve the effectiveness of a product and make it more appealing to a target audience. We plan to share rough cuts of all three of our products, to gain some constructive responses from a group of people that have been arranged for us. 

We analysed some video clips in class of both good and bad quality focus groups to gain a comprehensive knowledge of a decent technique. There are specific characteristics that will improve the quality of feedback. It is important to direct the audience to key issues of the product, while also asking open questions instead of only asking about what you want to hear. This will help in gaining an overall opinion as opposed to more specific analysis. You must listen and write down everything that is said. This is not an opportunity to sell the product, you are simply trialling the effectiveness.  Gaining criticism is important, as this session should not just act as a confidence boost for the group. It is also hugely important not to disregard, interrupt or try to defend yourself against peoples opinions. Everything should be considered valid and not taken personally. This can often prove to be a problem with this exercise, which is why in the real world separate companies are often employed to run focus groups as they are not attached to the product and are capable of remaining neutral during the process. 

In terms of preparation for this exercise, we will print of a rough copy of our Digipak. This will be printed out to the right size so that we can achieve the an accurate physical representation, as this this is the only of the three products that will end up being an actual physical object. We will publish our progress with the website online so that group can view this in its natural form meaning they can see how easy it is to use as a technological platform. We will also export a rough cut of how far we have got with the music video onto Youtube, meaning they can watch it on the big screen. We also began to consider some of the questions we might ask to the people on the day e.g. 

- What is the genre of the band? (Show Digipak and Website first as the video is the biggest indicator of the genre).

- State 5 words to describe the bands star image?

- What do you think the video is about?

- Do you see any major differences between the way the products represent the band?

We will film the focus group in order to achieve a thorough and accurate account of events, that is un-biased and in edited. However, this will not be on a large, high quality camera as this may effect that natural responses of the group. The group we will be presenting to are not our usual class meaning they no nothing about our products and also won't stretch their opinions due to personal relationships.

Futher Digipak Editing

I personally continued to experiment with the photos we shot for our Digipak. I was happy with our results but wanted them to look more edgy. After initially trying them in black and white, I then thought I would exploit the 'Noise' tool on Photoshop. This tool adds considerable grain to a photo, something that is visually fashionable today as it gives it an aged, vintage and shabby look. I am really happy with the way this has changed the aesthetic of the photos and plan to carry on with this whenever using photos from this particular shoot. It makes them more unique and also goes some way in clouding the outlines of the cropped boxes making it still noticeable but more seamless as we wanted. I have been surprised with how many people don't automatically know what we have done with these photos, initially thinking that the person just looks "weird, but so cool" as a peer said. 

Initial Website Development

This week myself and Rachel started making developments towards creating our website for the band. We used our preliminary research done on similar bands websites to establish what we should include on the homepage. This included;

- Most recent music video
- Information about the band
- Images of the band
- Merchandise
- Contact details

We decided to use web based design software Wix. We decided against using one of the websites pre-set templates as they limited our creative control in terms of layout.  Below is an image of our rough draft website 'Homepage'. The basic style is simplistic yet bold and takes after some other websites we researched of a similar genre. The background picture is of an oil painting, which we have colour inverted in Photoshop. We also found found a logo for our band that could run through our products. It suitably takes after the band name (Elephant Castle), combing the two. However, we feel this image still needs to be adapted slightly, possibly using Photoshop to make it more simple and take out some of the tonal lines. This is something we will experiment with next.

Below is the beginning of our 'Media' page which we have only just begun to create. We are utilising a Wix template that gives a dynamic 'Honeycomb' effect. This page features some shots that we took on our shoot day. This is ideal but I would prefer the photos to be more coherent in the style they have been edited, so they are less random. We may have to revaluate this. With this website, we intend to maintain our theme of the 'London underground'. It is impossible to see on this screenshot, but the titles for the menu bar embody different colours of the tube lines when hovering over them. This theme will be included more as the website progresses. I would like to change the base layer oil painting to colours that more represent the London tube.

Shooting the Digipak

After getting our key shoot day out of the way, we set about the task of securing our accompanying products. One of these is of course the Digipak. We still maintained our idea of amalgamating the faces of the band into one single portrait. We organised a shoot date with the band and arranged the photography studio accordingly. This was a chance for myself and Rachel to utilise our photography and photo editing skills for a different subject.

The studio was arranged in a fairly simple manor with a small infinity background, with the aim being to make this as white as possible. This would not only make the edit more simple but would also create parallels with the way we shot the video itself. We arranged markers on the floor both for us as photographers and for the band so they would all be standing in the exact same spot, making it easier to blend them together. As the taller of the pair, I took the photos. 

We got a standard portrait of each band member asking for them to look neutral, and directly into the camera. We then did the same but with the back of their heads to create the affect that we wanted. This was a fairly simple shooting process, and we knew that the edit was likely to be the more challenging. 

Once collating the portraits, we then ran them through professional photo editing software Adobe Lightroom. This is a software that I and Rachel are both well aquatinted with from other creative projects we have done in the past. This allowed us to heighten the 'clarity' of the photos, therefore emphasising the density and richness of the shadows and lines in their faces. It also meant we could use the 'soften skin' tool, while also pinpointing particular spots and dimples which we could exterminate with the precision that the software offers. This created four 'hyper-real', visually impactful portraits.

Before

After

Before

After

We then uploaded these photos into Adobe Photoshop where we could convert the files from RAW to JPEG, yet maintaining all the higher quality. Here we could start to amalgamate the photos and contort them with ease. This was an experimental process where we could try lots of combinations and see what we liked best. We started by sticking to the original design plan and chopping the photos into four sections;

This created an affect similar to what we had imagined but wasn't quite as fluid and seamless as I had hoped. We realised that this style is far more affective with three faces, as opposed to four, as it is easier to distribute the features of the face more evenly. We then began to try new layouts, and I came up with the idea of drafting single facial features that have been cropped from a different portrait. This would mean that there would be one 'base' layer of someones face, with other peoples features mapped over that;

Arguably, these photos are far more visually striking and interesting to look at. They distort the face in a very strange way and often change the mood of the original photo, as it begins to look like a different facial expression all together. It has an intentionally messy style which makes it resemble Pop Art in some ways. Both myself and Rachel considerably preferred this method. We are going to go forward with this editing style and try to blend it with text. This should help us make some key decisions on whether we would like to include all four portraits or just our favourite one. However, we still had to do something for the back of the heads so decided we would try a similar method but instead separating the image up into four quadrants, each containing a quarter of each band members head. We chose each quadrant specifically based on the hair cuts of the band so that it looked natural, yet still odd and almost unnerving. We were happy with the way this looked as it creates a small bit of contrast from the front, which is laid out in a alternative way. We found it interesting how well the haircuts actually fitted together as one, which acts as a juxtaposition to the seemingly 'shabby' style in which they have been amalgamated.